Bright Star recounts the sad (and true) love story between English romantic poet John Keats and Fanny Brawne, who was Keat’s neighbour in Hampstead during 1818. The two are very different: John is thinking about poetry while Fanny is more interested in her dresses, he’s dreamy, she’s very concrete, but this will not stop them falling (madly) in love with each other. The real problem is that Keats is poor, without any income, and completely dependent from the generosity of some friends and his talent as a poet to earn a living (talent that will be recognised just after his premature death). Therefore, he is not in a position to make any marriage proposal. The couple is dying to love each other, to live together, but they can’t, and this causes a desperate and painful situation. When Keats, very ill (with tuberculosis), leaves England for Italy in search of a temperate climate to spend the winter, they both know that they have few chances to see each other again (Keats, 25 years old, will die in Rome some months later). Fanny is left with the poem Keats wrote in her honour: Bright Star.
Visually enchanting, this movie teaches us that THERE is a way to film a period drama avoiding all the risks of stiffness and boredom that very often are the mark of this kind of movies. This is an old story narrated in an absolutely modern way. Images are vibrant, lively, full of colours, the perfect counterbalance to the increasing passion between John and Fanny. Seasons pass and we can enjoy the beauty of them. Some images are absolutely splendid: Fanny’s lovely silhouette dressed in white and bringing in her hands the first springtime blossoms, the glorious bluebells field in Summertime, and little Toots (Fanny’s sister) throwing away a leaf saying: “Go away leaf, there’s no space for Autumn here…”.
A word about the actors: Ben Whishaw IS the perfect John Keats. He’s got the right body and face to play the emaciated and feverish romantic poet, but with a modern touch, so that he could look like a contemporary maudit rock star. In real life, he is considered one of the most promising British actors (he’s been the youngest actor of theatre history to have played Hamlet, back in 2004). Australian actress and newcomer Abbie Cornish is perfect as well as the recipient of Keat’s affection: she’s fresh, witty, passionate and innocent in a very convincing way. In secondary roles, further excellent actors: Kerry Fox (who was unforgettable in Campion’s masterpiece An Angle at my Table) as Fanny’s lovely mother, Paul Schneider (a very good American actor recently seen in Away we go and Lars and the Real Girl) as John’s controversial friend, Mr. Brown. I personally think that the most beautiful character of the whole movie, a real gem, is Toots, Fanny’s little sister: she’s absolutely to die for.
This movie also reminds us how romantic we used to be a couple of hundred years ago, when a simple hand touching or a chaste kiss could resonate into lovers’ minds for months, for years, sometimes for ever. “Touch has memory”, says Keats to Fanny during their very last embracing.
This movie also reminds us how romantic we used to be a couple of hundred years ago, when a simple hand touching or a chaste kiss could resonate into lovers’ minds for months, for years, sometimes for ever. “Touch has memory”, says Keats to Fanny during their very last embracing.
Good movies too.
touch has memory
RispondiEliminaLuuvvvved it!
RispondiEliminaToots recalled Anna Pacquin's charater in "The Piano". The innocent ethereal go-between to the lovers.
The scene of Keat's coffin at a deserted Spanish Steps was poignant. How lonely it must have been to die virtually alone and penniless abroad.
I really like my anonimous readers!
RispondiEliminaThank you...
e ce l'abbiamo fatta! è solo dall'ufficio che non riesco a commentare!
RispondiEliminaCiao Fra, vorrei dire un sacco di cose, perdonerai la confusione. In primis mi è piacuto molto il tuo commento sul film il profeta. Non vedo l'ora di vederlo. Poi ho ripensato al discorso dei film tradotti oppure no. devo convenire che hai ragione. l'espressionalità dell'artista viene alterata traducendo ( in meglio o in peggio ) quindi ...... sarebbe meglio vedere tutto in lingua originale. Ci sono film che ho visto e rivisto in lingua originale perchè dovevo( ero all'estero), visti ora in italia in italiano erano stonati. e anzi, preferivo i modi di dire, le parole, l'accento dell'attore, che non la traduzione. Vorrei anche dire che sono stato con la mia fidanzata a vedere soul kitchen ieri e mi è piaciuto veramente un sacco. A questo punto comincerebbe la polemica... il film soul kitchen è molto divertente perchè racconta di un giovanotto ruspante che fa il cuoco nel suo locale. Il punto è che le scenette che si susseguono e che hanno fatto ridere tantissimo tutte le persone presente al cinema Anteo, avrebbero probabilmente disgustato quasi tutti se ci si fossero trovati nel mezzo... come te lo spieghi questo fatto?
RispondiEliminami sembra abbastanza per un commento solo.
Caro Pietro, innanzitutto grazie per il tuo lungo commento.
RispondiEliminaPer quanto riguarda Soul Kitchen (che, ahimé, non ho visto), mi spiego questa cosa come una delle tante magie del cinema: quella di farci provare delle situazioni che sarebbe difficile vivere nella realtà. Grazie a un po' di distanza (cinematografica) quegli spettatori hanno potuto ridere di cose che, nella realtà, avrebbero causato loro non pochi problemi. Mica male, no?
Però tiro un po' ad indovinare, non avendo visto il film...
ho recuperato ieri Bright Star, che avevo perso, e ahimé l'ho visto doppiato in italiano: devo dire che è stata una pessima esperienza, e mi ha condizionato anche molto l'intero film (che non mi è affatto piaciuto, neanche a livello registico). forse lo recensisco sul blog, così avrai la possibilità di difenderlo (più leggo in giro e più mi sento l'unico a cui non sia piaciuto...)!
RispondiElimina