Fight(s) Club

I am not a particularly litigious person.
I don’t usually like that much to quarrel and discuss, but if there is one thing in life I am ready to fight for, it is cinema. Touch a movie I love (or I don't love), and you’ll see.
The reasons why we like or hate a certain film are often mysterious and unpredictable, but I am convinced that this is part of cinema’s charm.
Sometimes we love movies because we consider them perfect and sometimes we are crazy about films plenty of flaws but absolutely irresistible to us, no matter what the most important cinema critics write about them. So, dear readers, here’s my TOP 5 List of movies I have most fight for or against in my whole life: 
1 -  BREAKING THE WAVES by Lars Von Trier (1996) 

A milestone, in my life. The strongest cinema experience I ever had: I saw it 4 times in theatres and every single time it was like a tsunami (easily created by my tears!). I adore this film and I had the most outrageous fights over it. A lot of people (mostly men) don’t like it. After almost 20 years, I could clearly see that the film was striking some very personal chords and my obsession with Bess McNeill at that time says something about it, but I still consider it a masterpiece and I would be ready to fight again and again and again over it. Little Bess For Ever!
2 - FIGHT CLUB by David Fincher (1999) 

Everybody knows it. There is no human being in this world that gets on my nerves like David Fincher. And my hatred for him started with this movie. I could have opened a fight club with all the fights I had over it (most probably with the same men who didn’t like Breaking the Waves...). I didn’t get the “free the animal that is in you/can’t you see we are all losers ‘cause we buy Ikea furniture?” kinda things. Not to mention that ridiculous final scene (you gotta be kidding me, right?). Things didn’t get better between me and David with his further movies. I think he is the most misogynist film-maker of cinema history. What can I say? I prefer directors filming “The man who loved women” to the ones filming “Men who hate women”.
3 - TREE OF LIFE by Terrence Malick (2011)

The problem with this movie, is that it’s almost a sin to declare that you don’t love it. I had a tremendous fight with an unknown person on Facebook, once. This man wrote something like: Who doesn’t like Tree of Life it’s because he/she doesn’t have the cultural supports to understand it!!! I almost killed him. That’s the thing. There is a moral judgement involved here, somewhere, somehow. And I can’t stand it. Even if Tree of Life (or any other movie of cinema history) would be considered the most beautiful movie of all time (and IT IS NOT), I think I would have the right to say that I don’t like it without having somebody telling me that it’s because I’m ignorant. I’m curious to know where all those Malicks fans where at the time of To the wonder, the movie he has done after Tree of Life. It was so awful that nobody had the guts to talk about it. Or maybe it’s because nobody had the cultural supports to understand it??! 

4 - ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA by Sergio Leone (1984)

I don’t give a damn about Sergio Leone and I dislike this movie. 
People almost faint when I declare this kind of things but what can I say? This is how I feel about this film-maker and about the movie which is considered his masterpiece. It was one of the most painful visions of my life and I was terrified by the violence in it. And no, I don’t think Robert De Niro is the most incredible actor of all time. I think he is a very good actor who played in many excellent movies but I also think he has done a lot of crappy films and that he wasn’t that good in them. 
Ok, end of my coming out!

5 -  AMOUR by Michael Haneke (2012)

Together with Fincher, Haneke is my second least favourite film-maker of all time.
He makes me feel sick any time I see one of his movies. This one was particularly painful to watch (not as much as The White Ribbon, I reckon, but I definitely had more discussions over Amour). What I can’s stand about this man, is his lack of empathy, his judgmental, cold and distant attitude. Enough of this. Jean-Louis Trintignant and Emmanuelle Riva are absolutely amazing in it and they are the only reasons why I watched this massacre until the end. I guess Haneke would do a better job making a movie called Hate. I’m sure he will be great at it!

The (anti) Social Network

In my life, I fiercely argued with people about two movies.

In one case (Breaking the Waves by Lars Von Trier) I was defending the film, in the other one (Fight Club by David Fincher) I was pulling it to pieces. There is something, in Fincher’s cinema, which gets terribly on my nerves. I am ready to admit that this could be a personal matter, since the guy is definitely able to make movies, but at the same time I think I have the right to say that his cinema doesn’t talk to me AT ALL and that I find it IMMENSELY boring. Yesterday night I made a new effort and, with the best intentions, I went to see The Social Network. And guess what.

Everybody knows Facebook, but maybe less people are aware of the bleak history behind its creation. In 2003, Mark Zuckerberg, a 19 years old geek from Harvard, dumped by his girlfriend and looking for some kind of revenge, creates in just a couple of hours an internal network where all the Harvard guys can choose the “hottest” Harvard girl. Impressed by what he has been able to do, he‘s approached by the twin brothers Winklevoss, who are looking for somebody helping them to develop an idea for a social network to be used at Harvard. Zuckerberg accepts their proposal but, as a matter of fact, creates from that same idea a new kind of social network, The Facebook, which has a striking success not only among Harvard students, but also among students from Columbia, Stanford and other universities in the world. From universities to the rest of the planet, and from few thousands to 500 million “friends”, it is just a question of (short) time. The process is not a smooth one, though. The Winklevoss brothers decided to sue him in court, as well as Eduardo Severin, Zuckerberg’s only friend. A guy who helped him launch the site but who’s been put aside after the arrival of Sean Parker, creator of Napster and smart entrepreneur able to provide Zuckerberg with huge amount of capitals and a bit of social life.

And this is the story of Mark Zuckeberg, youngest billionaire on earth, and possibly most isolated human being on the same planet. The End.

The first scene of the movie, a super fast and super sharp dialogue between Zuckerberg and his girlfriend, let me think for a moment that well, this could be a very interesting movie. The modern epic/greek tragedy all the reviews I have read were telling me about. Quite soon, though, I realized that the first scene was also the best one of the entire movie. No sign whatsoever of the passionate tale I was waiting for, but just the feverish account (feverish because Fincher tries to make it interesting proposing the sequences as well as the dialogues at a fast pace) of a bunch of jerks from Harvard trying desperately to achieve important purposes like entering into exclusive "final clubs" of their exclusive universities (where basically they can get drunk and girls take off their clothes during ridiculous games) or creating a social network, always for their exclusive universities, not particularly to get in contact with other human beings but just to make money or to have sex with some girls or to be considered “cool” by other people.

This is not epic, this is just depressing.

I wasn’t surprised, though, because this is the typical effect of a Fincher movie on me: I don’t like the subjects he chooses for his stories, I don’t like the way he tells the stories, I think that all the characters in his movies are incredibly superficial, I think he is pretentious and boring, and I also believe he is a bit chauvinist. I don’t mind looking at movies without even a single female character, but I do mind when female characters are on the edge of parody. In The Social Network you basically have Zuckerberg’s ex-girlfriend in a couple of scenes plus a lawyer at the end that look normal, otherwise all the others girls are hysterical bitches.

Welcome to his (fight) club, not mine.

The only valuable thing in this movie are some actors performances: Jesse Eisenberg (already seen and appreciated in The squid and the whale by Noah Baumbach) is perfect as the almost autistic Zuckerberg, while Armie Hammer playing both the Winklevoss twins is quite amazing. I wasn't particularly impressed, though, by Andrew Garfield and Justin Timberlake. I hope they can do better than that in their next movies.

When I think about Fincher, I think about these lyrics by a Smiths song, Panic:

Burn down the disco

Hang the blessed DJ

Because the music that they constantly play

IT SAYS NOTHING TO ME ABOUT MY LIFE

Hang the DJ! Hang the DJ! Hang the DJ!

I just need to replace disco with movie, and DJ with film-maker.

That's all.