Visualizzazione post con etichetta Sally Hawkins. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta Sally Hawkins. Mostra tutti i post

martedì 24 settembre 2013

Blue Jasmine

Black screen. Jazz music. Windsor font opening credits.
I have lived this same scene seated in a cinema every year of my life since I was 15, I reckon. A certainty more than a simple vision, a steady point in an ever changing world: a Woody Allen’s movie. 

There are days when I hope this is going to last until the end of world, or at least of mine (and since Woody’s parents are still alive, I count on his genes for that!). 
Not every vision has been the same, of course: sometimes it was enlightening, sometimes depressing, sometimes sidesplitting, sometimes inspiring and sometimes disappointing.
You can’t have it all, I guess.
After a circumnavigation that brought him around the world: London, Barcelona, Paris and Rome (I have to admit I refused to look at this last episode, because I understood it would have been part of the disappointing-almost unbearable ones!), Woody went back home, even if in San Francisco instead of the usual Manhattan, to deliver us this thing called Blue Jasmine

Jasmine (Cate Blanchett) 
Jasmine is a woman in her 40s whose privileged existence is turned upside down by the sudden bankruptcy of her husband. For her, used to fancy apartments, expensive gifts, glamorous parties, jet-set friends and a commitments-free life, this is the end of the world. Penniless, and with just a couple of souvenirs from her previous life (a Hermès bag, a Chanel dress and a pair of Roger Vivier shoes), Jasmine is obliged to join the only family she has left: a sister living in San Francisco. Both adopted, Jasmine and Ginger can’t be more different than they are: sophisticated and delicate the first, ordinary and messy the second. Their life together is not exactly idyllic, and for Jasmine is almost impossible to cope with a bad apartment, a new job, her sister’s two wild sons and gross boy-friends. Will she be able to survive to all that and find her way through a new life? Who knows… 

Dwight (Peter Sarsgaard) and Jasmine (Cate Blanchett) 
If there is one thing Allen is always been great at, it is to choose the right cast.
Even the worst of his movies could count on astonishing performances, and this has been especially true for actresses. I think the reason is simple: Allen adores women, he is able to understand them, to write about them, to let them be what they genuinely are. I mean, Diane Keaton in Annie Hall didn’t become an icon of her generation by chance. Not to mention some of the magnificent roles Allen wrote for Mia Farrow or Dianne Wiest. 

To play Jasmine, an extremely complex character, a woman perpetually on the verge of a nervous breakdown, Allen made the best possible choice: Australian actress Cate Blanchett. The movie is literally shaped on her: on her silhouette, on the way she talks, she looks, she wears, she drinks, she suffers and she swings between hope and despair. The subtlety of her performance is a never ending surprise: the actress gave herself completely to Jasmine, touching almost unbearable moments of truth. The rest of the cast is there to serve her but nevertheless extremely good, with a special mention for Leigh-esque Sally Hawkins as her sister and Bobby Cannavale as Ginger’s rude and simple-minded boyfriend. 
Jasmine (Blanchett), Eddie (Max Casella), Chili (Bobby Cannavale) and Ginger (Sally Hawkins)
How fake is the life we are living? Is our existence based upon real facts or based upon a fictional world we have invented for our own sake? Jasmine goes through her life always pretending: pretending Jasmine is her real name, pretending she’s always been rich, pretending her husband is not cheating on her and pretending her poor sister doesn’t almost exist. And then, when this house of cards collapses, giving her a real chance of changing things, she keeps making the same stupid mistake, pretending again. 
The older he gets the somber he becomes, Allen, following a Bergmanian path that he traced patiently film by film. In this one, there is no hope left.
As you sow you shall reap… not much in this case, I’m afraid.

lunedì 18 aprile 2011

The New York Trilogy - Jane Eyre

While in New York, I went to the movies three times.
I have seen three completely different pictures, but I have enjoyed them in the same, intense way. Each of them dragged me in their own particular atmosphere and I felt shaken by every vision, and it is exactly what I expect from cinema. Here they are!
Oh, I was SO looking forward to seeing THIS movie!
For two main reasons: I am a huge fan of the Brontë Sisters (I grew up reading and adoring their novels) and I am a huge fan of the actors playing the main roles. It is impossible to have seen all the adaptations of this book made over the years both by cinema and television, but I have always tried to be updated. The story is a classic of literature history (written in 1847): Jane Eyre, a little orphan, is put by her awful aunt into a gloomy school where she learns to be a teacher and a governess. Once left the place, Jane accepts a governess position at Thornfield House, and she secretly falls in love with the house master, the very moody Mr. Rochester. After a while, Mr. Rochester asks Jane to marry him: this is a much unexpected event for the girl, but things don’t go the way they should…
The young film-maker Cary Fukunaga (best known until now for his movie Sin Nombre) and screen writer Moira Buffini (best known for her great work on Tamara Drewe), managed to create a striking novel’s adaptation, with the benefit of a modern touch (especially for the gothic, almost horror-film atmosphere), but I really think that the movie should have been longer. The 2 hours version doesn’t allow enough time to the relationship between Jane and Mr. Rochester to fully develop. This is the only major defect I’ve found to the movie: when Mr. Rochester asks Jane to marry him, the proposal sounds weird not only to Jane but also to the movie audience. It is a pity, because the chemistry between the two actors is really amazing and all the first scenes between them are full of great expectations. The thing I wasn’t disappointed by, was surely the cast: young Australian actress Mia Wasikowska (her portrait of a suicidal teenager in the first season of In Treatment was simply unforgettable!) is a splendid Jane Eyre. Her mix of seriousness, dignity, wittiness and search for independence gives to the character a contemporary appeal. German/Irish actor Michael Fassbender is probably too young to play Rochester (he is just 34 years old) but he is so good to portray this grumpy, arrogant and yet fascinating man, that we instantly believe in anything he says or does (Zazie has been telling you this since 2009: watch, watch, watch for this actor, he will be very famous some day soon!). In minor roles, Dame Judi Dench, Sally Hawkins and Jamie Bell, reminds us that, well, British actors always do it better!
If you're looking for a truly romantic movie, you can't find a better one. 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...